As businesses grow across borders, managing foreign exchange (FX), cross-border payments, accounts payable (AP), and expenses can get quickly complicated. Currency swings, disconnected systems and manual processes often lead to hidden costs, delays, and risks. 

Modern fintech platforms take a different approach. They consolidate domestic and international payments into a single system, offering tools like spot transfers, forward contracts and limit orders for FX, automated transfers, AI-driven invoice processing, and integrated expense management.

This shift isn’t just about convenience. It’s about visibility, lower costs and smoother day-to-day operations. Below, we break down what to consider when choosing between fintech solutions and traditional banks.

The legacy of traditional banks.

Traditional banks play a foundational role in the global financial system. They are trusted institutions with deep regulatory experience and long-standing relationships across markets. For many businesses, they remain a reliable choice for core banking needs, domestic payments, lending, and risk management.

When it comes to international payments, however, most traditional banks still rely on the correspondent banking network — a system designed decades ago to move money across borders by routing payments through intermediary banks.

This model is proven and widely accepted, but it wasn’t originally designed with today’s always-on, globally connected businesses in mind. As a result, cross-border payments and FX transactions can come with trade-offs such as:

  • Higher and less predictable costs: Each intermediary bank may charge a fee, and FX margins are often built into the exchange rate rather than shown upfront. While this structure works well for established corridors, costs can increase significantly for less common currencies or lower-volume routes.
  • Longer settlement times: International payments can take up to 5 business days1, and sometimes longer around weekends or public holidays, as funds move through multiple institutions.
  • Limited FX flexibility: FX conversions are often reactive, with fewer self-serve tools for managing exposure. Without easy access to options like forward contracts or limit orders, businesses may find it harder to proactively manage currency risk.
  • Reduced visibility: Tracking payments through multiple intermediaries can be challenging, and in some regions, access may be restricted due to regulatory requirements or de-risking decisions.

Fintechs take a different approach. By building direct payment rails, partnering with local networks, or using blockchain-inspired settlement, they reduce intermediaries. The result? Faster transfers, clearer fees, and integrated FX tools that help businesses stay in control.

Security: How banks and fintechs really compare.

When it comes to money, security is non-negotiable. Let’s take a look at how banks and fintechs compare:

Traditional banks: Offer government-backed deposit insurance providing automatic protection if the bank fails. They also have long-established controls around encryption, fraud monitoring, and regulation. For example, in the US, FDIC provides up to $250,0002 in the US or equivalent elsewhere, UK’s FSCS provides up to £120,0003 for small businesses and individuals, and Australia’s FCS provides up to AUD $250,0004 per account holder per authorised deposit-taking institution.

Fintechs: Most fintechs are not deposit-taking institutions. Instead, they typically operate as licensed Electronic Money Institutions or partner with insured banks for safeguarding. Customer funds are typically held in segregated (ring-fenced) accounts, separate from the company’s own operational funds. 

Reputable fintechs match banks on transaction-level security, and in some cases deploy controls more quickly due to modern, cloud-native infrastructure. Common protections include: 

  • Strong encryption (e.g. AES-256)
  • Multi-factor or biometric authentication
  • Real-time AI fraud detection
  • PCI DSS compliance

While funds aren’t always insured in the same way as deposits, fintechs often have provisions in place such as bank guarantees so that customers can access funds in the event that the fintech becomes insolvent.

How fintechs reduce admin with smarter automation.

While automation is a priority across the financial sector, research shows that how it’s adopted and scaled differs greatly between traditional banks and fintechs. One study highlights this gap: although fintechs make up only around 40% of global financial services players, they account for nearly 70% of AI initiatives tracked between late 2022 and mid-20255. This suggests fintechs are moving faster and applying automation more broadly across their workflows with.

This difference isn’t about intent. Traditional banks may add automation onto existing processes rather than designed in from the start.

Fintechs, by contrast, tend to redesign workflows end-to-end, allowing more straight-through experiences with fewer manual touchpoints. Where fintechs really excel is at streamlining AP and expense management through cutting-edge automation:

  • AI-powered optical character recognition (OCR): Invoices (PDFs, emails, or scans) are automatically captured, data extracted with accuracy, and matched to purchase orders (POs), eliminating manual entry.
  • Intelligent workflows: Custom approval routing, budget controls, and policy enforcement happen in real-time, reducing shadow spend and delays.
  • Integrated features: Batch payments, early-discount capture, reconciliation automation, and real-time spend insights free teams from admin tasks.

According to OFX research, 94% of Australian SMBs using automated financial management processes report measurable gains, with over half citing faster reconciliations (51%) and nearly half reporting improved accuracy (49%).6

Choosing a secure fintech provider for AP and card payments.

It’s important to note that not all fintechs are created equal. If you’re looking for a provider, you may want to consider the points below. A strong fintech combines bank-grade security with agile innovation that modern teams benefit from.

  • Licensing and compliance: Look for regulated status (e.g., EMI license, PCI DSS, ISO 27001) and transparent safeguarding/partnerships with insured banks.
  • Security features: End-to-end encryption, token-based security (for cards), 3D Secure, real-time fraud monitoring, and adaptive authentication.
  • Integration and controls: Seamless API connections to your ERP/accounting software, adjustable spend limits, virtual cards, and audit trails.
  • Track record: Proven reliability, positive reviews, and experience with businesses like yours. Avoid holding excessive balances if insurance isn’t pass-through.
  • Support and transparency: Clear fee structures, dedicated support, and easy dispute resolution.

Why the best approach is often a mix of both.

Smart businesses don’t choose one over the other. They leverage both. 

They lean on traditional banks for core treasury, large insured deposits, lending, and regulatory-heavy needs, while they go to fintechs for agile FX tools (forwards, limit orders), fast cross-border payments, automated AP/expenses, and virtual corporate cards.

Many banks also now partner with fintechs (e.g., via BaaS platforms) to offer modern features. This hybrid approach delivers insured stability, plus cutting-edge efficiency, and improved costs, speed, and control.

Embrace the future of financial operations.

Sticking with manual and outdated systems could lead to higher costs, slower payments and unnecessary risks. A unified fintech platform for FX, payments, AP, and expenses empowers businesses to protect profits, streamline operations, and scale globally with confidence.

Source

1Papaya Global, How long do international bank transfers take?

2 FDIC, Understanding Deposit Insurance

3FSCS, Deposit protection limit increase

4APRA, Financial Claims Scheme

5McKinsey & Company, Banking trends snapshot: How banks can catch up to fintechs on AI.

6 OFX research commissioned by Vitreous World, ‘From manual drag to strategic finance.


OFX team
Written by

OFX team

We help businesses and individuals securely send money around the world by making it easier to navigate the complexities of foreign exchange. Our team consists of foreign exchange experts, dedicated support staff and knowledgeable writers.

Other interesting reads

How strong is your spend control?

How strong is your spend control?

At OFX, we know evaluating and updating spend systems aren’t simple. Even the best finance teams can struggle with fragmented payments, delayed visibility, and manual processes that quietly create blind spots. Getting a clear picture of spend shouldn't feel like another task to manage. This 10-question scorecard is designed to help finance leaders quickly sense-check how effective their spend control is across cards, vendors, expenses, and accounting. It highlights where risk, inefficiencies, or hidden costs may be hiding. We’ve also included some handy insights into how to rectify them with spend management tools that can help your business run smoother...

Read More
4 ways businesses are using corporate cards to simplify global spending.

4 ways businesses are using corporate cards to simplify global spending.

As companies grow and operate across borders, corporate cards are becoming more than just a payment tool. They help businesses manage international expenses, reduce FX costs, and keep cross-border payments simple. Corporate cards have evolved far beyond booking flights and hotels. Today, they’re a flexible tool that businesses of all sizes use to manage spending, support global teams, and streamline operations. Here are four practical ways companies are using corporate cards and why they are becoming an essential part of modern business finance: Improving visibility and financial reporting Managing everyday business and operational expenses Supporting global and remote teams Managing...

Read More
The true cost of waiting: What missed opportunities in global finance are really costing CFOs.

The true cost of waiting: What missed opportunities in global finance are really costing CFOs.

Executive summary The strategic blind spot in global finance. In today's fast-paced global economy, many businesses continue to rely on outdated and  fragmented financial systems for managing cross-border payments, expenses, and cash flow. While the immediate pressures of day-to-day operations often push innovation to the back burner, delaying the transition to a visible, modern financial technology platform carries significant risks.  Every reactive payment, unhedged FX exposure, or delayed transaction comes with a price: worse rates, higher fees, and lost margin. Dig deeper, and the real damage often shows up in manual workflows that waste time, limited visibility that forces reactive...

Read More